"add

Follow me on

Twitter Feed Facebook Feed RSS Feed Linked In Youtube

Brian France's Take on the state of the sport, heading into NASCAR 2010


  NASCAR's Brian France: a new game plan for the new season -- "more contact" (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

   By Mike Mulhern
   mikemulhern.net

   CONCORD, N.C.
   So what to make of the just-concluded annual January NASCAR Media Tour?
   First, that NASCAR execs Brian France, Mike Helton, Robin Pemberton and John Darby are tired of hearing complaints from drivers, car owners and fans, so they've decided to make 2010 a season of change: both on the technical front and out on the track – the NASCAR mantra: 'Let 'em race.'
   Like Pemberton said 'Go at it, boys, and have some fun.'
   Well, that certainly gives everyone pause for thought, particularly drivers, who must now decide how rough they really want to play with each other. Maybe NASCAR tracks ought to set up some grandstands out on the sidelines of the drivers' motorhome lot for the post-race action….
   If the action is exciting as it appears it may be, the job market for body specialists may suddenly be red-hot.
   And if ESPN/ABC can get their 3D-TV sports machine geared up, NASCAR-in-3D could be something else this season…
  Second, that the state of NASCAR media itself is pretty darned depressed. The tour, some 150-strong, was filled with some of the best-and-brightest NASCAR journalists…most either just out of work, still out of work, or quite underemployed. And the Charlotte and Raleigh papers added yet writers to the ranks of the departed as the tour was going on.
  
  


   So what will Rowdy Kyle Busch offer us this year, with NASCAR loosening the reins on drivers? (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

  On the PR side of the game, well, things don't really look that much better. The annual PR shuffle is still playing out, and some teams, even just a few days before SpeedWeeks opens at Daytona, are still without PR people. The only two PR camps that appear solid and rolling are the Rick Hendrick and Jack Roush operations.
   One big PR man missing from the tour this time was Jim Hunter, NASCAR's long-time power-behind-the-throne, the man whose wisdom and dry wit has helped keep the sport running. He's been fighting a bad disease since October, but he says he'll be at Daytona for SpeedWeeks, and France says "things are going well. He is about to get his clean bill of health back and join us for the opening of SpeedWeeks. And I know he is really looking forward to seeing all of you guys."
   Third, that the Ford camp is fired up, and the new NASCAR racing boss, Jamie Allison, looks as hyper as Rusty Wallace. Team owner Jack Roush and his number two, Geoff Smith, are in a very feisty mood; must be feeding the guys a lot of red meat over at that shop.
   
  


  Yes, Dale Earnhardt Jr. now has a beard...will it bring him better luck than he had in 2009? (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

  Fourth, that the Rick Hendrick operation is exuding just as much confidence as ever that they've got this little part of the sport's world on a yo-yo string. No chinks in the arm were visible at all. In fact Hendrick was showing off yet more new buildings and expansions.
    Fifth, the rest of the Chevrolet camp, including the HQ up in Detroit, appears in some disarray, or at least a state of confusion. Car owners Richard Childress and Chip Ganassi sounded no closer to closing the gap on Hendrick. And Childress has to deal with some major loose ends – he's lost one entire team, because of sponsorship issues (Casey Mears is looking for a full-time, or even part-time Cup ride), and Kevin Harvick, starting his 10th season with the Childress Cup team, still appears ready, even anxious, to leave at the end of the season and the end of his contract – an uncertainty that certainly won't make things run any smoother until he does make up his mind what's next.
    Dodge and Toyota?
   Well, the Joe Gibbs operation looks quite solid; Kyle Busch has been signed to a new contract, Joey Logano and crew chief Greg Zipadelli are ready to crank it up another notch after a successful rookie season, and Denny Hamlin and crew chief Mike Ford are now solid championship material.
   Michael Waltrip and GM Ty Norris keep adding good men to key positions, and the addition of crew chief Pat Tryson could be a major plus.
   Just what to make of Toyota's Red Bull operation, though, isn't easy to see. Brian Vickers made the chase and should be the anchor; but teammate Scott Speed never really got going in his rookie year.
  
  


   Will all three Richard Childress teams be on the same page this season? More important, will it be the right page? (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

  And just what Roger Penske can do as King Dodge this season, well, Kurt Busch won't have Tryson as crew chief this season (Tryson decided to move on at the end of 2009), but he will have Steve Addington – an irony, considering Busch's kid brother Kyle essentially pushed Addington out the door, despite Addington leading him to 13 tour victories over the past two years – more wins than anyone but Jimmie Johnson. Of course if NASCAR's 'let 'em play' edict is firm, well, Penske has rowdy Brad Keselowski, who still has Hamlin's head in a vice after their several run-ins.
   France himself is leading the charge for change – the new flat-blade rear spoiler comes after complaints from fans about the wing. And the 'let 'em race' rule comes after driver complaints NASCAR trying to enforce calmer racing at Talladega.
   While the sport has essentially boiled down to Hendrick-versus-Roush, with bit parts by others, France points Hamlin and Juan Pablo Montoya as the newest success stories.
   And France insists the 2009 Cup season was "the most competitive in the history of NASCAR," despite complaints by drivers at times and by fans too.
   Still France points out the positives: "You really have at least 25 teams that believe they can get into the chase and compete for a championship."
   Now in theory that may be true, but out there where the boots are on the ground it looks a little different – there are 10 driver-teams head and shoulders above the rest, with two 'wild card' spots in the playoffs, if things go routinely. And the game, as played the last few years, has been for top teams to run the first 26 races fairly conservatively, most weekends, to avoid any big mistakes. After all, to make the chase, a driver need only be in the top-12 overall by early September.
  
  
  


   Pro wresler Ric Flair as new NASCAR president? Well, Brian France says drivers can take the gloves off (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

  

  One major issue for France and his men to battle – TV ratings…which have been sinking the past two seasons (and of course not just for NASCAR).   
    ESPN's 3D may be a game changer.
   And NASCAR is using a Wall Street Journal report that the highly-touted NFL actually only carries 11 minutes of real live action during each three-hour game.
    France has spent the past three weeks in a series of meetings with teams and drivers, "listening more than talking," according to one participant. And change is coming. And Rick Hendrick says he sees more changes coming throughout the season. And Roush says he anticipates more changes over the next year too. Whether all that change just plays into the hands of the mega-team owners, who have hundreds of men in their shop, or to level the playing field remains to be seen. NASCAR may really need to loosen up its rules to make things happen for smaller teams.
    But what France focused on: "This is a contact sport.
    "We have got the best racing in the world -- what are things we can do to make it better? What are things we can do to open it up a little bit?
    "Whether it's specific changes or whether it's just how we officiate the events week-in and week-out, we are going to have an eye on putting things back in the drivers' hands. They are going to mix it up a little bit differently, because we are going to loosen it up."

   
   


   NASCAR's Murders' Row: The Rick Hendrick Gang. Can rival Jack Roush whip them this season? (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
   

    The rest of the stuff France talked about – the diversity efforts (which appear to be struggling, particularly in the weak general economy), the iRace computer games (cue computer whiz Dale Earnhardt Jr.), and 'green' initiative (expect fuel injection by 2011 in all three series) – may not seem like headline stuff. But those projects are key to keep NASCAR rolling, and France realizes it.
   The 'green' project – though there are those who decry that whole deal as a bunch of tree-hugging – may be crucial to NASCAR's seemingly somewhat tenuous relationship with Detroit (especially with the new Washington aspect to deal with).
    "NASCAR," France says, is "smarter about how we go about our energy 'footprint,' smarter about how we treat the environment.  
     "We went from literally nowhere 18 months ago to hiring Michael Lynch, our director of 'green' innovation.
     "In addition to being good stewards of the environment, we also want to be appealing to new, 'green' companies that are going to have technologies they want to verify or validate. And we want to be a place they are encouraged to do that."
   
   


   Now in the Ford camp, the Richard Petty-George Gillett team...the operation Ray Evernham built for Dodge (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
   


   One question: just how key is Detroit to NASCAR? Has NASCAR let its teams become too dependent on how Detroit plays the game? That's not a new question of course, with more than one in the sport worried that Detroit plays too big a role.
    Nevertheless France insists "while we are not economists…some things are stabilizing for us and our sport."
    And he points to the relative "stabilization" in Detroit (though just what is going on at General Motors, and just who is really in charge, is still up for debate): "A year ago there was a whole bunch of uncertainty," France said.
    "They had very challenging business models…at that point they were unsure about the funding they might get from Washington.
    "We were very supportive on that bill…and we were supportive with our car manufacturers.
    "All four car manufacturers in NASCAR are much healthier than they were just a year ago.
    "And they have all continued their investment; it may be different now, and it may be different in the future, but they have all still recognized NASCAR as a place that works for them."
    On the other hand, NASCAR's tracks are a different story. Many are 'downsizing,' taking away seats, some in creative ways, by opting for new wider seats.
     And France concedes "the rest of the economy is much trickier. Certain places, like Michigan, California, and Florida have been very hard hit."
    He does point to the efforts by his tracks to deal with the economy: "They have been cutting ticket prices…they have zeroed in on their race markets -- with the hotels and restaurants, to get discounts."
    But France's basic game plan here is simple – back to Curtis Turner basics: "We are going to open it up -- because we want to see what you want to see: More contact. This is a contact sport.
   "We want to see drivers mixing it up.
    "We want to see the emotion of the world's best drivers, just as much as everybody else does. And that is the goal."
   
  [Note: You can use Twitter as an easy headline service for mikemulhern.net stories, with our instant Tweets to your mobile as soon as our newest NASCAR story is filed. And mikemulhern.net is mobile-friendly for viewing. You can also use the orange RSS feed button as a quickie headline service on your laptop or home computer for mikemulhern.net stories, by creating a Live Bookmark RSS feed on your web browser's toolbar. Or you can create a Google Alert for mikemulhernnet.]

     


  NASCAR adding green to its racing logo (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)

  

I guess it's a wait-n-see

I guess it's a wait-n-see approach to this whole thing. Because of it's optimism, I hope NASCAR is being loud and clear and not backing off "let'em race" change.

Will the same go for the "phantom cautions" of the past or let 'em race? We'll see come February 14.

I'm sure Daytona will take

I'm sure Daytona will take care of itself (particularly now that it's not a 330 pm start).
I like the let-em-race thing; but will these high-dollar drivers really take the ball and run with it. I still remember Talladega last fall and all that single-file stuff. That stunk, and the drivers -- well, I'd have fired my driver if he just stuck in line and didn't do anything. What do you think Dale would have done?

I noticed you left out

I noticed you left out Stewart HAAS Racing in your review...I get the feeling they are sitting fairly pretty when it comes to Sponsorship and PR? I think they still could use some sponsorship for Ryan's ride..but in general are doing alright? They announced a "third" pit crew for training and to "loan" to Labonte's ride..I didn't read if they are charging Labonte's team to use the crew or it's gratis? As far as what NASCAR has to say..all I can say is we shall wait and see. I watched some of the "whoopla" last Thursday..but was mostly peeved they interrupted the replay of the July Daytona race so they could blah blah blah about themselves...JUST DO IT! I am over all the He said/She said junk...I just want to watch the races..I will form my OWN opinion....It does gall me NASCAR blames some of the outcry on "the media"...with all the problems cited with the racing the last couple of years...did NASCAR REALLY need to open ANOTHER can of worms by implying it's fans are SO DUMB they can't form their OWN opinions and believe their OWN eyes and ears....? If I was NASCAR ..I would quit while I'm ahead..and NOT bring up the media vs NASCAR vs fans AGAIN! NASCAR fans don't live in the land of "Stepford"!

Don't fret: I have not yet

Don't fret: I have not yet begun to write. I'll have at least five more major pieces out this week, and Darien Grubb and Ryan and Tony Gibson will be in one of them.
And as far as NASCAR, well, blaming the messenger is a time-worn tactic, but NASCAR is starting to listen very closely to its fans....and of course with a close eye on the bottom line. This, after all, is still a family business. And ABC's decision to junk the chase from network must be seen as a blow to NASCAR's ego (though ESPN, if it can get everything working more smoothly, should fill the void fine); that's the real reason for the change. When Brian France negotiated the first big tv deal, he insisted 'it's not about the money,' but rather about getting this sport front-and-center on network tv. Now 'network tv' has itself changed quite a bit since then, and ESPN may actually be the right venue for all this...but ESPN it would appear has way, way too much on its plate, with all the sports stuff it carries. Less is sometimes more, I would think.
Bottom line here: give me some decent racing in California and Vegas and Atlanta, and let's get the season started off with a roar....

NASCAR: GREAT RACING - GREAT

NASCAR: GREAT RACING - GREAT STORIES.

Huh?

In the 25-plus years I've followed NASCAR I've yet to see a scenario for the sport with fewer "great stories" than the present era. There is nothing remotely "great" about the megateams or the lack of new winners despite last season's spurt. Juan Montoya is being touted as a great story, but he's nothing of the kind - he's an F1 reject who hit a surge during the summer and could not cash in. Denny Hamlin has proven to be a strong competitor but he's got a superteam behind him - he would not be a story unless he was accomplishing what he has with a small team.

Even when they try to change for the better they're still going about it wrong. They're now talking "this is a contact sport." No it isn't; it's a sport about passing. Fuel injection has become a goal but is worthless. The Ric Flair promo is as embarassing as anything SMI can come up with - the All-Star Race has not been a real race since the wreckfest of 1994 won by Geoff Bodine and Hoosier Tire.

The sport has far more to fix than what present leadership has the ability to handle.

Yet on the positive, NASCAR

Yet on the positive, NASCAR is now saying it will make changes, after two years of trying to brush problems off. That's a big change. Let's give Jim France -- who owns the sport and is the real power that makes things happen -- credit for kicking things into gear.
I say let's wait for the Phoenix-Texas-Richmond run in April-May before making any assessments.

OK Mike...I was with you on

OK Mike...I was with you on your last comment until you went there.....WWDD? I really really really intensely dislike it when ANYONE pulls out the "what would Dale do" card... Earnhardt is NOT here...we don't have a magic ball or a hotline to heaven (or where ever)...and it is such a disservice to anyone to put a deceased person on "the spot". Dale was a great driver..he's gone..we miss his presence on the track and off..end of story. The MORE important question is "What will the drivers do this season?" I didn't have a problem with last fall at Talladega ... it was actually a little funny..till the crash..AND we have seen single file racing at Daytona and Talladega in the past..as well as lagging to the back or trying to stay out front. As far as I was concerned NASCAR put themselves in that position..and the drivers went alittle "overboard" in carrying out their new "rules". It actually was an interesting race..I would put it in the same "interesting" category as the Indy 400 race a couple years ago with all the tire problems...you reap what you sow. I am curious with the larger restrictor plates and bump drafting back in play...if we are going to see a great race at Daytona..or a demolition derby. I am sure my nerves will be frayed halfway through the race!

hey, Dale won a lot of races

hey, Dale won a lot of races at Talladega, 10 of them, i think, and a lot of races at Daytona too(and i saw every one of them), and it's a legitimate point to raise -- would dale earnhardt have just stayed line for two or three hours? i dont think so.

I disagree. Earnhardt by the

I disagree. Earnhardt by the end of his career had become as much a points racer as anyone. People like to point to his last win, at Talladega in 2000, without noting how uneven he'd been in the previous 25 plate races - he'd swept Talladega in '99 but managed only a pair of mediocre seconds at Daytona that year and had gone the previous 18 plate races with just one win (Daytona 1998); I noticed in '99 and 2000 how he looked a little intimidated racing John Andretti in the #43, as Earnhardt seemed to have more trouble passing John than he did most others (he had to cheapshot John at Daytona in '99 and in that 2000 Winston 500) - and without noting how little he fought for position in most races - what always struck me the last four years of his career was how little he fought for anything, and even in 1995-6 there were periods where Earnhardt could have fought harder but didn't, and this was before his injury. I'm not sold that Earnhardt wouldn't have become a points-racer in the 2009 Autumn 500 - if he'd seen two cars blast away from the pack in a locked-bumper superdraft, he'd have stayed in line making sure it didn't happen again, either.

How about some speculation on

How about some speculation on who may be in line to take John Darby's position as Sprint Cup Director?

okay, I'm game: you give me

okay, I'm game: you give me some names. actually with mike helton and robin pemberton already at every race, i'm not sure we need someone else too. those two handle the heavy lifting. the one thing the cup director needs to do is stand out in front of the media and explain why nascar just did whatever it just did -- and i of course would prefer a crew chief, hopefully one who can deliver sound bites -- like Todd Berrier? Now if NASCAR would pay the freight, that's the guy i'd put in there. But whoever gets the job is suddenly every further down the totem pole than john darby -- start with jim france and lesa france kennedy and brian france and mike helton and robin pemberton, and throw in execs like steve o'donnell and paul brooks, and a few others, and by the time you get down to the cup director, well.....i doubt whoever gets the job will really have much authority in the grand scheme of things...maybe nascar should go straight over to the tv compound and find someone....like, say, darrell waltrip?

What has really changed for

What has really changed for this year's Daytona 500. In my eyes nothing has. They say they are going to give them a bigger restrictor plate but after the first practice when the drivers start complaining about the closing rates they will change it. It has happened before like maybe 2 years ago.

what worries me is nascar

what worries me is nascar never floated any of these ideas last fall; they just threw the whole wad of changes on these teams a few weeks before the season begins. the plate deal in particular? to change the plate -- and they make it sound like it's a big deal, and maybe it is -- why not have a daytona practice in mid-january to check out the closing rate and all that? am i missing something here, or is all this just a knee-jerk reaction to abc pulling the plug on the chase?

I think some of it is

I think some of it is knee-jerk reaction to ABC's decision. The plate deal sounds like appeasement to someone - the myth of throttle response gets tossed around whenever a plate change is made even though the drivers have proven over the last 21 years that throttle response is overrated as far as ability to race goes. Not taking away the yellow line rule is stupid, because the myth of danger is just that - myth. Racing below the yellow line wasn't unsafe before (don't cite Daytona 1999 because that was Gordon's recklessness with a slow car ahead of him) and it isn't unsafe now. And I've noticed NASCAR still has not addressed issues such as closing pit road (a rule that has to go) or in talk about attracting more manufacturers the idea of more tire manufacturers is never included - even though the sport needs the revenue Firestone and Hoosier can bring plus the change in competitive dynamic (more winners and more upsets) they bring.

How can anyone be surprised

How can anyone be surprised at Nascar's plight. Brian France was born into Nascar, as soon as he could, he took off for California to play until his father became too sick to run the series, then Bryan came back and remade the sport into his own weird image.
The cars used to look like the cars that we drove, they don't any more. To my knowledge, the only company that even comes close to making a car similar to what Nascar is running is Dodge's Charger with the Hemi engine. You can buy one of those, but you can't run it in Nascar! Nobody else even has a car in that class with rear wheel drive, let alone a V8!
What they are running doesn't look like anything except a Nascar racer and since they are all virtually the same, it comes down to who is lucky this week.
Years ago, Nascar had maybe 7 or 8 teams capible of winning, today it's the same, only those teams now have more than one car and there are fewer teams!
The Chase is just plain stupid, sounded good when first presented but everybody runs to get in the chase now and nobody runs for the win. Furthermore, the last race the only emphasis is the winner of the chase, nobody cares who won the last race!
Then Brian took the Southern 500, the oldest most prestigious race in Nascar, took it from Darlington moved it to a place that wouldn't even support the NFL!
Want to save Nascar? Bring back Wilkesboro, Nashville and the Rock. Limit every track to one sprint cup race and upgrade the Nationwide series to a par with the sprint cup also promoting one race at each track. You would have shorter seasons, then you could promote a few races with the top 20 from each series to determine a championship of stock car racing.
Put the Labor Day race back in Darlington. Let the competitors run stock bodies and engines. I know that will slow the cars down but at least you will be able to tell who's driving what without a program. I do like the idea of a qualifying race for the go or go homers.
Finally, GET RID OF THE CHASE as it stands now, it just hasn't produced what it was supposed to produce, one has only to see the TV ratings to determine that! If they want a unique way of determining the championship, have the top 12 drivers draw 12 specific races from a hat and total up those points from those races after the season is over. Do that at the awards banquet. You might actually get a TV audience for the event it that way.
I don't know that this will "fix" nascar but it sure can't hurt, the damage has already been done. Finally, give Brian France a job counting the money and let someone run the sport who knows what they're doing and actually cares about the sport! Humpy Wheeler comes to mind but Humpy is a smart man and for that reason, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't touch that job with a 10 foot pole.

Well, I understand where

Well, I understand where you're coming from....and LA is a tough market, but with that many people NASCAR should be able to put 92,000 in the stands twice a year.
Yes, more street-car body cues, definitely, and I think NASCAR wants to go there now, because of complaints just like your's about these common template cars. the common template was wrong, plain and simple. just an excuse -- for both detroit and nascar --
it might be nice to change up the tour into different forms, and including wilkesboro and darlington and rockingham...why not some one-day/one-night cup events?
the chase has good points and bad points. it sounds like a good idea, of course, but it simply hasn't worked out -- why? that's the better question. let's figure out how to tweak the chase so drivers dont simply stroke through the regular season?
nascar's biggest problems lately has been its unwillingness to change, it's unwillingness to accept ideas from others, it's unwillingness to listen. Maybe that's changing. I'm going to watch the season unfold up through early May and then start to form some opinions.

Amen, brother. AMEN!

Amen, brother. AMEN!

We need to puncture some

We need to puncture some enduring myths here, plus other observations -

1 - The cars stopped looking "like the ones we drove" in the latter 1960s with steady advancements in aerodynamics. The "rear wheel drive with a V8" argument is irrelevant; NASCAR runs those specs in the races because they work, and it found out that requiring street models to conform with those specs was unrealistic. Get over whether a street model doesn't run a V8 or rear-wheel drive; they don't need street models to conform to those specs.

2 - "They're all the same." Of course they are. This isn't NASCAR's fault, it's form following function. A look back through the years shows the cars have always been more alike than different. It reflects a reality once noted by Robert Yates - the most aerodynamic form that exists is the raindrop.

3 - The Chase format has indeed failed. NASCAR thought it could make a multi-car battle for the championship with the format; all it did was lock out 3/4ths of the field from any points relevance and demoralize the field accordingly - points racing thus took even greater precedence over fighting to actually win something, putting the lie to Mike Helton's assertion that drivers want to win.

4 - The Southern 500 was already in its grave before the date was switched to Fontana. Switching the date back to the south hasn't worked either, as Atlanta is a dismal sports demographic that may lose more than one of its pro sports teams and will almost certainly lose at least one of its races (more likely both). People need to give up on the Southern 500.

5 - Wilkesboro and Rockingham dried up as NASCAR demographics long before their dates got pulled. The myth of Rockingham in particular got punctured when it reopened, debuted races in warm spring weather - and failed to draw. The myth that Rockingham attendances suffered because of poor scheduling was thus exposed as a lie. Wilkesboro was a dismal track, outdated by over a decade before it closed. The idea that fans will return to NASCAR by returning to those places is ludicrous; they are terrible racetracks that deserved to be yanked. Lower-level NASCAR touring series like the Trucks and BGN can have those places; Winston Cup does not belong at either.

6 - Stock bodies and engines won't slow the cars down, and they're so brittle as to make nonsense of the sport's safety crusade. The cars in their present specs are superior to stock.

7 - What will revive NASCAR is the following -

* The fall of Hendrick, Roush, and JGR and the rise of smaller teams.
* The return of competing tire brands against Goodyear; tire wars have always changed the sport's competitive dynamic for the better.
* The phase-out of the COT design and replacement with the "standard" design of long snout, flush nose/airdam, chopped roofline, shortish rear deck, large blade spoiler, and roof blade atop the car for draft-inducing drag.
* Greater restriction of horsepower and increase in downforce and overall grip via wider tires, so drivers can run open throttle and fight harder a la the Modifieds at NHMS.
* Abandonment of the Chase format and replacement with the standard Latford Point System with 125-point bonus for race winner and 100-point bonus for most laps led per race; the result is a points system that directly requires winning and leading.
* Abandonment of rules giving the tower more control of the racing than the racers - yellow line rules, pit closure rules, pit speed limits, all must go, replaced with better judgement on driver recklessness and requirement that pit crews cannot go over the wall until their car has come to a complete stop in their stall, with mandatory parking of cars that strike crewmen.
* Mandatory spending caps on raceteams.
* Elimination of Winston Cup participation in lower-level touring series (Busch/Nationwide, Trucks, etc.).

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.

© 2010-2011 www.mikemulhern.net All rights reserved.
Web site by www.webdesigncarolinas.com