"add

Follow me on

Twitter Feed Facebook Feed RSS Feed Linked In Youtube

Bruton Smith: Add some passing lanes to Sonoma's Infineon -- for better racing


  
That's right, Mr. Smith -- open up some new passing lanes at your Sonoma track (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

  

   By Mike Mulhern
   mikemulhern.net
   

   SONOMA, Calif.
   Okay, first things first:
   Bruton Smith, who owns this picturesque track just north of San Francisco, needs to invite Juan Pablo Montoya, Jeff Gordon, Tony Stewart and Robby Gordon back, before next year's 350, and get their input on how to add more passing areas to this two-mile layout.
    Perhaps widen, and bank, the esses.
    Perhaps reinvent the Kulwicki Corner carousel, where drivers, if not right on their game, could too easily wheel-hop their cars and create opportunities for those right behind them.
    Perhaps change that whole parking lot corner, the flat 180 at the end of the esses, that may be the most interesting passing area on the track but certainly one of the silliest looking corners on the entire tour. NASCAR should not be parking lot racing, around barrels.
   Much of Sunday's racing was flat boring. So give these drivers more passing zones.
   That's a no-brainer.

    Second, this points chasing racing. It stinks. That's not good NASCAR racing. That's stroking.
    Time for NASCAR officials to man up and come up with a system that better rewards wins….and that doesn't hurt a team so much when it has a bad day.
   Stroking? There ought to be penalties for that.
    Denny Hamlin, increasingly frustrated at not winning this season, despite all the opportunities, once again let one slip away.
    "We had that slow pit stop on the last stop, and it allowed Kasey Kahne and Tony Stewart to go out right in front of us -- and that was the race for the win," Hamlin said. "I knew it was as soon as I saw them pull off pit road. 
    "They had a little bit fresher tires, so for us to hang on to fifth with old tires that's pretty good.
    "It's solid days like this where you can't think about wins, in the points position we're in right now.  We're trying to gain points over that 13th place; that's the most important thing for us -- to make that fourth consecutive chase. Once we do that, then maybe we can think about taking chances. But right now it's all about getting points."
    Juan Pablo Montoya: "We finished sixth, another good points day.
   "But the car just wasn't up to it. We struggled putting the power down so much.
    "So it's a little disappointing.
    "But it's good. This is all we needed to do, and we did that -- It was a good points day, and the bigger picture is good. I can't really complain."
    Sorry, points racing shouldn't be 'the NASCAR way.'

    Third, gas-mileage racing? That stinks too. Maybe once a year, it's cute. But that's three or four straight races now that fuel mileage has been such a big part of the game.
    One suggestion – a mandatory fuel stop caution with 80 miles or so to go…..so drivers can go flat out down the stretch, instead of feathering the pedal.
    Another suggestion – NASCAR should let teams put better fuel gauges in the car.
   
   On the plus side of things – a big plus here -- Goodyear finally appears to have solved it's Indianapolis tire problems…just in time for July 26 400.
    Drivers seem pretty upbeat about what they've seen.  Carl Edwards says "The tire test at Indy went really well.  That Goodyear tire felt good, it felt good to drive. 
    "You could get the car a little bit sideways and it didn't feel too treacherous.
    "And the wear looked good, the wear that I saw.
     "I think it's cool that Goodyear is putting so much effort into it.  I’m glad they included me because it's nice to see a few laps around the place."
    So those tire problems are history?
     "I guess you never know until the race starts," Edwards says. 
     "You get to see some long green-flag runs in groups (in testing); but it felt pretty good out there testing.  I didn't have any trouble with the tire.
    "I don't remember much about that tire last year.  We never got a real good feel for it because you never ran it hard. 
     "This tire I ran as hard as I could. 
     "I did a couple of 10-lap runs, but mostly we did five-lap runs. 
      "There were other guys doing longer runs.
     "It felt good to me, It felt like a tire should.  I didn't have any issue with it.
     "The thing I was nervous about is it would be so hard that it would be real treacherous to drive on. But it didn't feel that way.  It felt pretty good."

Blow Sears Point up and make

Blow Sears Point up and make it a superoval. It's impossible to make a good racetrack out of a road course. Bruton certainly has tried, the way he's carved up Sears Point to where it's nothing like it was in 1997, but it hasn't worked. The varied message boards always have people who say "add banking to this track or that track." Sears Point and Watkins Glen, if they ought to remain in Winston Cup at all, need that treatment - they need to be blown up and remade into superovals.

As far as points racing goes, I've long advocated dropping the absurd Chase format and going with front-end-loaded bonuses for winning and leading - take the basic Latford point system and increase the winner's total to 300 points, down to 175 for second and so forth; then increase the bonus for most laps led to 100, so it becomes mathematically impossible to win the title without most wins and most laps led.

And yes on a competition yellow in the final 80 miles of a race so teams never have to run fuel mileage.

Well, i'm sure Bruton would

Well, i'm sure Bruton would turn Sonoma into another Bristol if California laws would allow it...but in California it's hard to get anything done....so i would just settle for some wider spots in the track....and i figure JPM ought to know what to do....
i agree that leading and winning should be the key points in the championship.....

LOL - I should have thought

LOL - I should have thought of the fact it's a beech to get something done in California.

Seriously, another Bristol? Sorry, but one is too many right now. It's a superspeedway sport. Widening some areas of the present layout would certainly help right now.

Hey, wait a minute, I got it.

Hey, wait a minute, I got it. Why not carve out the whole track and put in a 1.5 mi Cookie Cutter Oval. That would surely solve your disappointment in lack of passing. Sonoma is TECHNICAL, get it? It's supposed to be difficult to pass. Jeesh!

yes, sonoma is a technical

yes, sonoma is a technical road course...but NASCAR racing is supposed to be entertainment, not F1. Give the drivers places to pass....and let them play roughhouse, without those penalties Nascar keeps dishing out, and change that silly points structure that rewards someone for settling for second place or third place.....

how about bulldozeing it and

how about bulldozeing it and bring racing back to the rock, i wish this guy would leave racing alone

Hey, bring racing back to the

Hey, bring racing back to the rock...that's got a good ring to it -- run it as a two-hour timed event under-the-lights on a Midsummer's Wednesday night -- one-day in-and-out. would you buy a ticket to that?

Add passing lanes...are you

Add passing lanes...are you nuts? With only 3 short tracks left on the schedule, and Bristol being neutered by being close to the crapshoot and the repaving, rubbing is racing only seems to happen on the road courses these days! I agree about gas mileage being a problem, but unless the gas in the tank outlasts the tires, nothing will change.

I thought the crapshoot was supposed to eliminate 'points racing'? seems to me it's only gotten worse. It now starts almost immediately, since the 'season' effectively ends after 26 races. Anyone too far out knows they are locked out of making the top 10 because of the new format, so they have no reason to push hard thru the last 10 races.

Maybe Nascar should be looking at Lime Rock or VIR to make some more excitement.

you're right about points

you're right about points racing being worse today than ever.....let's give a 100-point bonus to the race winner, you think?
and i'm rethinking the way nascar handled that saturday race at sonoma, when joey logano got spun out....i'm thinking nascar needs a better rule for a situation like that -- what would you suggest. Joey's leading, gets spun out, finishes 17th....Maybe if NASCAR would let teams duke it up, western style justice might be the best policing...

I like Sonoma just the way

I like Sonoma just the way that it is. I think the races there are great. Sunday's race was awesome. Not every race needs to have a million lead changes for it to be a great race. Road courses are supposed to be technical tracks which require different skill sets than ovals. I don't want to see Sonoma changed so that it's just as easy to pass on as it is to pass on an oval. Leave it the way it is.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.

© 2010-2011 www.mikemulhern.net All rights reserved.
Web site by www.webdesigncarolinas.com