"add

Follow me on

Twitter Feed Facebook Feed RSS Feed Linked In Youtube

Now Bruton Smith is saying what?


   Jamie McMurray did the Sonoma advance work, after winning the Daytona 500. Now can he back it up during race week here in San Francisco? (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)  

   By Mike Mulhern
   mikemulhern.net

   (Updated)

   SONOMA, Calif. 
   Tires or gas, or track position? That's always a question on road courses, particularly Sonoma.
   Drivers always want more grip, especially here, with so many corners. But with just a few good passing spots, track position is important too. And gas is pretty straightforward – a driver can make the distance on just two stops.
   Kevin Harvick, the Sprint Cup tour leader going into Sunday's Toyota/SaveMart 350, says "Tires meant more than fuel last year. You could really make up a lot of ground putting new tires on.
   "So it is just a matter of what tire they brought and how much it falls off, as to where that balancing act is, as far as when you pit and when you don't pit....when you stay out toward the end of the race.
    "Double-file restarts clog everything up. So it just depends on how much time you think you can make up on new tires....as to whether you try to pull fuel strategy.
    "And with the green-white-checkered deal (three possible attempts), you've got to have some cushion, because if you have a caution at the end of the race, you are probably going to go two or three green-white-checkereds.
    "And there is a lot of contact here, so better be ready for multiples."
   Indeed, and this is the first road course of this 'Boys, have at it' season. So will drivers be a little rougher than usual here?
   Carl Edwards, who roughed up Marcos Ambrose to win at Montreal last summer: "You could rough someone up here, but it's hard to rough 'em up enough to put 'em out of the race.
   "I do think you'll see a little different fuel strategy, with the potential for three green-white-checkers. If some guys start running out on the first green-white-checkered, then you could see a really strange finish."
    Edwards, Paul Menard and Brad Keselowski are the three Cup regulars shuttling between this track and Wisconsin's Road America, for Saturday's Nationwide race.
    Tires, gas, or track position? Todd Berrier, crew chief for Jeff Burton, says that track position is always good to have but that it's a toss-up between tires or gas -- make it on two fuel stops, or gamble on an extra stop for tires and use that speed to some advantage.
  "Last year here eight of the top-10 finishers made three stops....but that's because there was a caution on lap 54 (of the 113) that made that possible," Berrier says. "If not for that, the race would have gone two stops. Like it or not, you've still got to have track position...
  "Now Clint Bowyer and Jeff Gordon pitted (again) with 15 to go and finished in the top-10. But that's because a lot of wrecks allowed them to do that."
  
  


  It never rains in this part of California....Jimmie Johnson, here running through the back-40, won't need rain tires (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

  Jimmie Johnson, facing fatherhood for the first time in a few weeks, concedes the last few weeks haven't been that great for him and his team, but he insists he's not in a 'slump.'
   "The last two weekends have been more about stopping the bleeding," Johnson says, "and not losing more points and slipping further down in the standings.
   "We did a good job the last two weeks about not taking unnecessary risks. And I didn't stick it in the wall.
   "But we didn't have a  race-winning car the last two weeks. We were competitive, but my problem has been that I could see the front and figured I could make up a tenth or two and make it race-winning car. And I've made mistakes. So I've tried to eliminate that.
   "Every team is going to struggle sometime during the season. And as much as I hate to go through it right now, I'm excited that it's now and not September that we're going through it. And we have time to turn our cars from being top-five cars to dominant cars.
    "We're just playing a little catch-up right now.
   On the other side of the picture, Johnson is here this weekend trying to add a road course win to his NASCAR resume. He says "it's aggravating" not to have won yet on a road course. And he has been doing extra work to pick up this part of his game, like running a Grand-Am race in Watkins Glen.
   So Johnson, while insisting he won't be overdriving this weekend, in trying to get that first win here, says he has been analyzing races here.
   "The start of the race here, the first 15 or 20 laps, there is some give-and-take," Johnson says. "But then after a while something happens, and one guy screws over another guy...and the energy changes.
   "And everyone you come in contact with is more irritated.
   "By the end of the race it is just cutthroat. In every braking zone guys are blocking...and the guy who is being blocked says 'The hell with you, I'll just spin you out.'
   "And off they go.
   "There is an energy in the race that kicks in...and I want to avoid that. I don't want to get caught up in that. If you get red-faced and caught up in those little battles, before you know it, you're sitting in the dirt or in the tire barriers, with the fenders torn off the car.
   "I want to stay away from that if I can help it. And one way is to stay up in the top-three on the track. It seems to be a lot safer up there...a little more respect."
   Winning here, or at the Glen, Johnson says isn't so much a 'resume builder' as it would be just eliminating an 'aggravation.'
   "Winning the Brickyard, winning at Bristol, those are resume wins," he says. "Winning here – not winning here is just an irritation, because I know I can do it. I've run fast and good on road courses. I know I can win at this."
    And the fatherhood update: Wife Chandra is due around July 11th. "No more traveling for her...and now it's just wait-and-see," Johnson says.
   
  


  Juan Pablo Montoya won here in 2008, but he hasn't won since. And, despite a lot of speed this spring, he's had some hard luck. But he is probably the sport's best road racer (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

   THE NASCAR NOTEBOOK

   The latest twist from NASCAR promoter extraordinaire Bruton Smith:
   He says he may move next summer's Sprint Cup race from Loudon, N.H., to another track if the local police department doesn't cut its bill for track security.
   Last weekend Smith surprised everyone by throwing cold water on a Sprint Cup race for his Kentucky Speedway in 2011, which raised questions in the NASCAR garage about what he might have up his sleeve.
   Speculation has been that Smith might move one of his Atlanta race dates to Kentucky, possibly the second event, which runs Labor Day weekend. However the move last year to Labor Day proved a boon to Atlanta, which drew a nice crowd.
   When Smith first bought the New Hampshire track there were questions about whether he might take one of those two Cup dates and move one to his Las Vegas Speedway. He quashed those questions then. But now?

   Kyle Busch says Sunday's game plan here is easy: "It's a two stop race.  You play it from the checkered flag.  If you can go 30 laps on fuel, you'll go from the checkered flag back 30 laps; that's when you'll stop. Then you'll go back 30 laps from there and that's when you'll stop. You always try to stretch it from the end of the race as much as you can on fuel mileage, so you really have to work fuel mileage."

   NASCAR executives are asking drivers and team owners for suggestions about how to improve the sport.
   -- How to perk up NASCAR's championship chase? Maybe by eliminating teams one by one during the final 10-race run: The last of the chase guys after each Sunday's race gets eliminated.
   -- How to perk up NASCAR crowds?  Michigan's Roger Curtis is adding his name to that of those NASCAR promoters wanting NASCAR to open up testing for Cup teams, not just to help the teams but to help the Cup tour tracks too with a bit more promotion. After all, NASCAR's testing ban hasn't stopped teams from testing, just from testing at NASCAR tracks, which Texas' Eddie Gossage says is not logical.
  

     [Note: You can use Twitter as an easy headline service for mikemulhern.net stories, with our instant Tweets to your mobile as soon as our newest NASCAR story is filed. And mikemulhern.net is mobile-friendly for viewing. You can also use the orange RSS feed button as a quickie headline service on your laptop or home computer for mikemulhern.net stories, by creating a Live Bookmark RSS feed on your web browser's toolbar. Or you can create a Google Alert for mikemulhernnet.]
       
  

  
  Bruton Smith loves a crowd....and he loves to be the center of attention, which he certainly is at the moment with his teasers about Kentucky Speedway and New Hampshire Motor Speedway (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)
  

Bruton, for once in your life

Bruton, for once in your life sit down and shut up!

How to perk up the Chase? Eliminate the Chase altogether and front-load big point bonuses for winning each race and leading the most laps. Can we make the point any stronger, NASCAR? Make it mathematically impossible to win the title without winning the most races and leading the most laps.

Drop all limitation on testing - testing limits is a 20-year failure of NASCAR policy and it has to end.

leading laps should be the

leading laps should be the premium, and winning races. points. yes.
and i agree on opening up testing again.....the rich teams test wherever and whenever they want anyway....

I agree, STP43fan. The best

I agree, STP43fan. The best things NASCAR could do is reset things to before the Chase began, get rid of it completely, put the old car (twisted sister or not, the racing was better), do away with the daggone gear rule, let the crew chiefs have some latitude and open up testing again.

Plus, somebody stick a sock in the mouth of anyone with the last name of Waltrip. It's like hearing a song played on the radio too often, it gets old and the Waltrips and their shilling for NASCAR and whoever else they are being paid by has worn out its welcome.

the gear rule? hmmmm. let me

the gear rule? hmmmm. let me ponder that. i think nascar should first of all cut horsepower significantly; 900 hp engines -- give me a break? do they really look at the racing at fontana -- 209 mph into the first turn, as flat as it is? cut those speeds by 20 mph...and that would mean cutting cubic inches, which would have to be policed (for rpm) by a gear rule, i would think.
i agree that letting crew chiefs play more is a good idea; too many high-dollar engines in the game, to the detriment of smaller teams that can't afford them.
The Waltrips? Gosh we've been hearing them so long now that it's like the wind, isnt it...lol

I want NASCAR to open up

I want NASCAR to open up testing, but give an equal amount to each owner. If you own one team, then you get the same number of tests that Hendrick, Rousch, and Gibbs gets as a whole. That's the reason they took it away, was to try to keep the super teams from getting a huge advantage by testing to death. Well, all it has done is make them test to death elsewhere and to use their simulators to kill the smaller teams even more. If you limit it by owner, rather than by team, then the multi-car teams don't get 2 or 4 times the number of tests the single-car teams get.

The Chase is staying. Get used to it. The points system itself needs to be tweaked, but I doubt that happens in my lifetime. It was developed in a time to try to keep broken-down cars on the track to make it look like a show in the days when mechanical problems were much more prevalent. No one outside the Top 20 or Top 25 should get points. If you wreck, park it. Keep the garbage off of the track. Spread out the points, and put even more emphasis on winning.

Bruton needs to move a race from New Hampshire to Kentucky, but using the police as his reason is a copout (pun intended). ISC needs to shuffle some of their races to Gateway and Nashville, and let's see if a Cup race at PPIR would draw flies. You'll never know until you put one there. The TV ratings won't be any worse than what they are at some of their current tracks with Cup races.

yes, open testing again...and

yes, open testing again...and that's an interesting idea, of each owner getting the same number of tests. but i'm sure the big guys would figure a way around it. nascar doesnt really like the little guys imho.
the chase, as defined as the last 10 races of the season, with a playoff cut, may be okay, but it hasn't lived up to its potential, except in 2004. why is that? change the tracks is one idea --
point system -- circa 1974 -- needs to be changed, to put emphasis on leading laps. a five-point bonus for leading the most laps is absurd; how about a point per lap led, and see who knocks who out of the way to lead....
I dont understand what Bruton is trying to do, but if i run into him today, i'll try to wrestle something out of him. think the new hampshire police thing is a ruse, because nascar wouldn't like the idea of taking a race out of the boston market, considering the next closest thing nascar has in the NE is Dover/Pocono. And i may like cincinnati/kentucky, but i really dont see how much that would add to a sponsor's marketing plan, and that's what we should be looking at -- getting markets that appeal to sponsors and potential sponsors. so would it be boston vs cincinnati? Boston No. 10 vs Cincinnati No. 24.
and what is the deal in denver? i've never figured that out. why did nascar give up on it?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.

© 2010-2011 www.mikemulhern.net All rights reserved.
Web site by www.webdesigncarolinas.com