"add

Follow me on

Twitter Feed Facebook Feed RSS Feed Linked In Youtube

NASCAR's appeals court to Carl Long: Hasta la vista, baby


  
Journeyman racer Carl Long: gets the big boot from NASCAR (Photo: Getty Images for NASCAR)

  

  

   By Mike Mulhern
   mikemulhern.net

  
   NASCAR showed no mercy to journeyman racer Carl Long in his Tuesday appeal.
   All those record-setting penalties stand.
   And that means Long's career in racing is all but over.   
   And NASCAR officials thus add to the sanctioning body's growing image as an organization little concerned with the little guys of the sport.
   Long got no relief from NASCAR's appeals panel Tuesday over his plea that a record-setting $200,000 fine, a 12-race suspension, and a 200-point penalty were overkill for an engine he used in an All-star weekend preliminary race at Lowe's Motor Speedway.
   A three-man NASCAR appeals board gave no mercy to the part-time independent owner-driver, who has run occasional  Cup events over the past 10 years, typically far back in the pack.
    Long, makes a living working for a Cup team as Sunday spotter, and this penalty essentially puts him out of work. Following the decision he called NASCAR officials "bullies, big bullies."
   Long says there is no way, on his salary, that he or his crew chief can afford to pay a $200,000 fine.
   Long says he bought the engine in question from veteran engine man Ernie Elliott, a used engine from the Chip Ganassi testing department. It blew up in practice before the race, and Long had to switch to another engine. When NASCAR tested the original engine, it found it slightly larger than the 358 c.i. limit.
    With his backup engine, Long finished last in the prelimary race and earned $5,000.
    Long had offered an emotional appeal of the staggering penalties, calling them far out of tune with the offense, particularly for a small-budget driver like him.
    NASCAR brushed off Long's plea and let the penalties stand.
   This is the report from NASCAR's three-man appeals board, John Capels, Jack Housby and chairman George Silbermann:
    "The penalties concern Section 12-1 of the NASCAR Rule Book 'Actions detrimental to stock car racing,' Section 12-4-I 'Any determination by NASCAR Officials that the Race Equipment used in the Event does not conform to NASCAR rules,', and Section 20-5.4A 'Engine exceeded the maximum engine size of 358.00 cubic inch displacement.'
    "The penalties assessed were:
   -- A loss of 200 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Car Owner Points; suspension from the next 12 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Events; suspension from NASCAR until August 18, 2009; and probation until December 31, 2009 for owner, Danielle Long;
   -- A loss of 200 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Driver Points; suspension from the next 12 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Events; suspension from NASCAR until August 18, 2009; and probation until December 31, 2009 for driver, Carl Long.
   -- A $200,000 fine; suspension from the next 12 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Events; suspension from NASCAR until August 18, 2009; and probation until December 31, 2009 for crew chief, Charles Swing
    "The Appellants did not contest that the engine was oversized. 
    "They argued that the engine had been supplied by a third party and that the infraction may have been due to an error on the part of that supplier, or to expansion due to overheating, or to general wear and tear on the engine. 
    "The Appellants further argued that they are a very low budget team incapable of bearing suspensions and a fine of this magnitude. 
    "The NASCAR representative argued that NASCAR has and continues to consider an oversized engine to be one of the most egregious of rules violations, warranting the harshest of penalties.  The last penalty notices issued in NASCAR's top series for an oversized engine were in 1991 and included 12-race suspensions in the series and a sizeable fine for its day."
   NASCAR's long-standing rules limit displacement to 358 cubic inches.
   NASCAR said "measurements on the engine in question calculated to a total cubic inch displacement of 358.197." 
    "The Commission reaffirms that the race team is ultimately responsible for all components on the race car, including any supplied by third-party vendors.
   "The Commission notes that during the hearing, the driver expressed a strong love of racing and a desire to compete at the highest levels of the sport.  His testimony came across as genuine and heartfelt.
   "While it is tempting to consider penalties that this driver and team can more-readily bear, the sport would not be well served by having a sliding scale of penalties calibrated to a given team or member’s resources. 
    "Penalties of this magnitude for this type of infraction are warranted in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series."
    The committee then decided to uphold the penalties.
    Long has the right to appeal once more, to Charles Strang, a man known as the National Stock Car Racing Commissioner.

As much as I hate to, I have

As much as I hate to, I have to agree with them.

the sport would not be well served by having a sliding scale of penalties calibrated to a given team or member’s resources.

If penalties were based on resources, it would benefit the less well funded teams to cheat because if they are caught, the penalty would be much less tham for the Hendrick/Gibbs/Roush crowd.

this sport would be better

this sport would be better served if the officials running it showed some commonsense, which lately they haven't. IMHO

"The sport would not be well

"The sport would not be well served by having a sliding scale of penalties calibrated to a given team or member's resources."

This is a baldfaced lie on NASCAR's part because they already have such a sliding scale in the weak punishments they hand out to the big-budget teams. The Hendrick/Gibbs/Roush crowd cheat with impunity because they know the punishments won't hurt them at all.

As much as I hate to, I have

As much as I hate to, I have to agree with them.

Explain more please. When

Explain more please. When Michael Waltrip is given a free pass at Daytona for an apparently deliberate attempt to circumvent the rules, when Jeff Gordon is given a free pass at Daytona for failing post-race inspection after winning a race, and when NASCAR then hits little-guy Carl Edwards with a record fine and penalty and essentially puts him out of business, sorry, NASCAR is wrong. But then maybe NASCAR figures Carl Long's fans don't count -- but check out his website -- NASCAR fans have donated more than $16,000 to help him pay that fine. Maybe the France family and NASCAR president Mike Helton should take note.

And maybe we could have an

And maybe we could have an independent auditor come in and check Carl Long's donations and ensure they're all correct....and have that same auditor check out the NASCAR penalty fund and see just where all those fines are going.

If I had a dollar for every

If I had a dollar for every time NASCAR violated Section 12-1 of the NASCAR Rule Book 'Actions detrimental to stock car racing', my retirement plan would be set even in this bad economy.

There has always been a sliding scale for NASCAR's penalties, and that's why so many were outraged when they came down ridiculously hard. This penalty would not have been assessed to any of the Big 4 teams or their drivers.

This is another outragous

This is another outragous Move by NASCAR that makes No sense, Ya gonna drive Carl Longs Team outta Business, when Dodge has pulled backing from RPM, GM has going Bankrupt and Fan Loyalities to the sport are fading fast, for exactly these kinds of reasons. I guess NASCAR figures the fields are to large. I wrote NASCAR myself last week after being BOOTED from their Chat for mentioning our Online Race Site. Weird they want us to come together to chat but you're not allowed to communicate in ways that Might Bring more fans together, (for the GOOD of the sport)in discussion sites. I've stopped buying my anual $600.00 Daytona Tickets, have canceled my Race view this year, and am Borderline on going fishing on Sundays for the rest of the year.

xTerMn8R

The blame-game can go any

The blame-game can go any number of ways here. While I know that "Saturday Night Racing" does not rank way up there with the greatest racing show on earth, most grassroots tracks and series have "officials" with enough COMMON SENSE to pull a driver or team owner over to the side when something so small as Long's infraction is discovered, warn them of the infraction and 999 times out of 1000, the driver will thank them for enlightening them and not come back with the part in question. Clearly the guy that inspected the engine in the first place was looking to "make his mark" as an "official".

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.

© 2010-2011 www.mikemulhern.net All rights reserved.
Web site by www.webdesigncarolinas.com